Many households are just one layoff, one illness, one interest-rate hike away from financial catastrophe.
I know this is true — that as things are now, a perfectly ordinary bit of misfortune could easily ruin someone's life — and yet whenever I'm reminded (most recently by a "Daily Show" interview with Elizabeth Warren), my first reaction is always shock. Yes, things used to be like that, but we fixed it. We created a safety net. Right?
Upon reflection, what I find most striking is that the period when there was a real safety net that actually protected households was pretty brief. It started with the New Deal, grew a bit with the Great Society, and pretty much ended a couple of decades ago in the era of deregulation and globalization.
To someone my age, the current situation is kind of shocking. I grew up during that period when an employee could expect a job to last for decades. When most jobs included medical insurance. When most consumer loans were at fixed interest rates that couldn't be raised.
Someone who came of age in the mid-1990s or later would not be shocked. In fact, they'd probably be pretty puzzled that anyone was surprised. Younger workers know perfectly well that their job will disappear if there's a 15-minute period in which there's no work for them to do. They have no personal memory of the days when the whole point of a "layoff" was that it was temporary — that laid-off workers could expect to be called back when production started up again. (They quite likely have no personal memory of production ever starting up again — their experience is of production moving overseas.)
Because of this division, I want to present the strategies for making your household economy a bit less fragile in two pieces. (See also: The Second-Best Way to Make Your Household More Secure)
First, the ordinary strategies that have been the core of household security for most of my lifetime, the ones you can read about in any standard book on personal finance. I call them twentieth century strategies, although their heyday was really from about 1945 through 1990.
Have an emergency fund with six months minimum expenses. (Keep at least a little of it in cash.)
The main purpose of this money is to tide you over if you lose your job. It's also there so that you're not forced to take on debt to cover an unexpected expense.
In addition to a fund of cash, keep enough basic supplies on hand to see your household through a blizzard or a flood or a power outage that shuts down the ATM machines. (If you buy the supplies for this stockpile at a discount, you can also score some huge tax-free investment returns.)
I've written before about how debt makes your finances fragile. When you have specific dollar payments that you need to make, you're utterly bound to the money economy.
Especially avoid credit card debt. Although things are a bit better now thanks to a couple of new laws that restrict banks from changing the terms and conditions of a debt, credit cards remain a risky way to borrow money. If you really think borrowing is the right move, consider doing what people used to do — taking out a loan. Borrow money for a specific purpose at a specific fixed rate, with a specific fixed repayment schedule.
It's not only debts that crush you when there's an interruption in your income. Every recurring expense makes your finances more fragile. If you've never had to resort to emergency belt-tightening, you'd probably be surprised just how low you can get your spending on a temporary basis. But every fixed expense — rent, utilities, cell phone contract, fitness center membership — is a fixed-dollar amount that you'll need to pay out, even if you have a sharp drop in income or a sharp increase in expenses.
If you can possibly afford it, you need to insure yourself against the risks that would otherwise ruin your finances. That means health insurance and liability insurance in particular. If you own a home or a car, and you don't have cash to replace them, you need to insure them as well.
In the United States, of course, health insurance is a huge problem. If you're old or sick, the only way to get health insurance is to work for a large company that provides it as an employee benefit. (This is scheduled to get a lot better starting in 2014.)
These additional strategies weren't so important during the decades of the New Deal and the Great Society. But they once again become important in today's world, just as they were in the early decades of the last century and before.
Keep your skills up-to-date. Keep your documentation of them up-to-date. Stay in contact with your network of former coworkers, former managers, and former employees. Don't depend on your employer to do anything beyond paying you for the work you've already done. Take responsibility for your own career management.
This used to be ordinary, but fell by the wayside as cheap shipping and specialization enabled much higher standards of living for people who worked for wages or a salary and bought everything they needed. Full-blown self-sufficiency was always a hard way to live, but a little strategic partial self-sufficiency can make your household much less fragile. Each little thing that you can provide directly (rather than buying it in the money economy) is one more area where your household doesn't have to depend on anyone but yourselves.
The idea that a single breadwinner following a one-job career path could provide a stable source of income for a family has been dead for a long time. Most households have long sent a second (or even a third) family member into the workforce.
I recommend having a little capital deployed to earn money — stocks, bonds, rental property, etc.
Having a hobby that can be scaled up to a small business during periods of unemployment is good. Perhaps even better is a family business (or family farm) that can be run by just one member of an extended family, but that can provide employment for any family member who happens to be out of work. (That's pretty much the way families were always run, from the dawn of civilization until well into the industrial revolution. It was a good strategy then, and I expect it will return as a key organizing principle of the economy going forward.)
This is really an extension of that last idea. Until the last century, this would have been everyone's default answer to the question of how to make your family more secure — when the people around you are more secure, you're more secure as well.
There was a brief window in the mid-to-late twentieth century when we thought we'd permanently moved beyond some of those concerns, but that turns out not to be true. Explore the strategies that successful people used in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to make their households more secure. Consider employing those same strategies once again.
Sadly, that seems to be what it's going to take to make your household more secure.
Disclaimer: The links and mentions on this site may be affiliate links. But they do not affect the actual opinions and recommendations of the authors.
Wise Bread is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Philip,
I think that you have a good strategy to make sure that someone can follow to make sure that they can sustain an illness, job loss or worse. I think that creating multiple streams of income is one of the best ways to make sure that one can thrive. No company has one customer and that is exactly what most people do with their employer. Your employer is your customer. You sell them your time and effort in turn for the sale (your paycheck). If there is a layoff, you have lost your one customer. Diversify your customer base!
Cheers,
Joe
I think your points are extremely valid, like a condensed version of Dave Ramsey. Thanks.
Thanks, Philip. This is a good introductory post for anyone trying to rebuild their finances. I'm with you on improving one's employability. And with the Internet cranking out online work opportunities, it's a big help if you have some web skills to bank on.
I agree with all of this. We have gone through downsizing and job loss and are in it right now. It's been stressful. We do have some money saved and I have good benefits right now, but my paycheck suffers dearly from low wages and the high cost of benefits. We could never live off of my income alone. Impossible. My husband has worked 2-3 jobs ( full time plus one or two part-time) to keep us afloat. It's nothing short of tiring. We try to avoid the credit card but sometimes we can't. I have alot of medical stuff due to being diabetic but I try my best every day to stay healthy. I think that working as a team (if you have a significant other) is essential to accomplish your goals. We don't have family near us to help in any way, so we raise the family alone. Once, we all had the flu at the same time and were all in the hospital together!! I think that having conscious spending, having anyone who is healthy to pull a second job and decrease as much in expenses as possible helps. Jobs are very unstable and being prepared for the worst is always the best thing to do.
Professor Elizabeth Warren studied the root causes of thousands of bankruptcies and concluded that 87 per cent of all bankruptcies were caused by three factors : (1) job loss; (2) medical problems; (3) divorce or separation. Althoug rainy day funds and other techniques may help a fortunate few, long term unemployment or chronic medical problems (nonetheless divorce) are not always avoidable or mitigated. I respect the determination of the other people who commented but the barriers to overcoming major set-backs are growing for middle class families.
You're right. All the suggestions I proposed, including the old ideas from before there was a social safety net, will not reliably protect a family from those sorts of major problems. (Although they'll help, and certainly everyone should do those things. For every major catastrophe there are dozens of minor catastrophes that can be dealt with.)
What's most interesting to me has been the change in psychology. Young people (those who came of age in the 1990s or later) see the fundamental unfairness in a social safety net that protects some people better than others. But whereas in the 1960s the impulse would have been to extend the social safety net, in the twenty-first century the impulse seems to be to strip away the remaining protections from those who have them.
Terrific post. Excellent diagnosis. But it's hard to see where any improvement to the sad nation of the nation will come from.
I do not understand how we could "we'd permanently moved beyond some of those concerns" because there is always times of feast and famine. We need to have safety nets and not all of those should come from the government but from ourselves and our neighbors.
Please explain just how things will "get better" in 2014 regarding healthcare??? I see looming disaster.
I wrote a whole post on why I think the health care reforms on their way will be good for people like me:
http://www.wisebread.com/health-care-reform-good-for-people-like-me
The gist of my complaint has long been that choosing not to work a regular job amounts to taking a huge gamble that you'll only ever get seriously ill (or injured) one time (because once you do, insurance will become unaffordable, or even unavailable).
I'm pretty healthy, so I can get affordable insurance. But what if I get sick? I'll have coverage for that illness, but after that I'd be screwed. That's what I want fixed, and I think the current health reforms will fix that problem.